- Google is attempting to replace all major web technologies with alternatives developed in-house.
- Microsoft attempted to replace all major web technologies with alternatives developed in-house.
- Microsoft is (or at least was) evil.
- Google is now becoming evil.
(Sorry, can’t remember where I saw this.) I think there is actually some truth to this argument, but it has nothing to do with being “evil.” Rather, it is simply a symptom of having too many very good engineers all working together in the same environment.
Engineers always want to make better pieces of technology. The better the engineer, the greater their ambition. Get a bunch of them together in the same place, and they’ll try to remake the world in their image.
Unfortunately, at a certain scale their efforts are almost guaranteed to fail. It isn’t because they aren’t good. It is because they don’t know their limits. And their limits are also simple to explain, but hard for many to believe.
We cannot engineer novel complex systems. Full stop.
If something is very complicated and you’ve built one before, you can copy the past design and do a reasonable job – as long as you don’t change too many things. If you are engineering something on a smaller scale, it is possible to design it from scratch and have it be quite good. But once a system gets complicated enough, nobody understands the whole problem. And if you don’t understand the whole problem, you can’t engineer a solution.
But we build big systems all the time, right? Yes, we do, but what we do is engineer parts and then put them together in a process that is, more or less, trial and error. We try things, we see what happens, and inevitably tweak/hack things to get them to work.
Google is doing what Microsoft tried before simply because they are both places with engineers who don’t know their limits. Well, Microsoft now knows its limits – it hit a wall, and is now a much more humble company. Eventually this will happen to Google as well.
Such is the way of evolution.